[Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#786836: packaging not yet ready for mass/stable usage

Luca Bruno lucab at debian.org
Thu Dec 10 20:57:49 UTC 2015


[dropping the BTS]

On Thursday 10 December 2015 12:22:25 Sylvestre Ledru wrote:

> I am working on the packaging of 1.5. I will close the bug as part of
> the upload.

Even better :)
We were talking about this today in IRC, and we think you'll probably get 
stuck on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29490

> I will also replace the hash of the package by the version as discussed
> a couple months ago.

After last mail from Angus, I got convinced that at this moment there is no 
gain in doing that.

My only point was to keep the same binary-pkg name to skip multiple NEW trips 
for alpha/beta/stable, but it is not really feasible.

The other feature is only cosmetic, but given that this package will never be 
installed manually, it is quite a marginal point.

I'm not sure what other thinks, but given that both ways have disadvantages:
 * hashes are hard to read and to correlate with real version
 * versions do not match with the real content of the package / soname 
I'd personally stay with hashes in binary package names. This at least stays 
as close as possible to usual .so policy in Debian.

Cheers, Luca

-- 
 .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **  | Luca Bruno (kaeso)
: :'  :   The Universal O.S.    | lucab (AT) debian.org
`. `'`                          | GPG: 0xBB1A3A854F3BBEBF
  `-     http://www.debian.org 	| Debian GNU/Linux Developer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-rust-maintainers/attachments/20151210/618583ae/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-rust-maintainers mailing list