[Pkg-salt-team] zeromq3

[Alessandro Ghedini]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:12:43AM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On lun, mag 13, 2013 at 09:34:49 +1000, Joe Healy wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Alessandro Ghedini <ghedo at debian.org> wrote:
> > > On lun, mag 13, 2013 at 12:45:10 +0200, Julian Taylor wrote:
> > >> As zeromq3 has two RC bugs it won't migrate to testing.
> > >> What is the status on these issues?
> > >
> > > I have looked into this briefly just now, and: the kfreebsd failures are kind of
> > > hopeless since I can't reproduce them in the Debian porterboxes, while the s390
> > > failures are reproducible, but may take some time to get fixed (and I don't have
> > > much myself right now).
> > >
> > > The short-term solution would be to ask removal of zeromq3 from both kfreebsd
> > > (which wouldn't affect pyzmq, since it never built there anyway) and on
> > > s390/s390x (along with reverse deps).
> > 
> > You have just answered my next few questions!
> > 
> > My understanding of the reverse dependencies are:
> > 
> > salt (not yet, but any architecture)
> > libtango8 (and associated packages) [1]
> > 
> > Of these, I'm not exactly sure how to check, but it appears that they
> > are not used on s390 or kfreebsd
> 
> Thinking a little more about this, it's probably better to just make those test
> failures non-fatal (with the caveat that I should really fix those s390 failures
> at some point).
> 
> I'll look into this.

I just did this. Unless something bad happens, zeromq3 should migrate to testing
in ten(ish) days.

Cheers

-- 
perl -E '$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-salt-team/attachments/20130514/ffb59c66/attachment.pgp>