martin f krafft
madduck at debian.org
Sun Aug 25 05:18:24 UTC 2013
also sprach Joe Healy <joehealy at gmail.com> [2013.08.25.0216 +0200]:
> python-zmq > 13
> cython and libzmq3 can be done at the same time, python-zmq depends on
> the others so must be done afterwards. Once all of these are in then
> we can do salt itself.
Are you going to have to do all of these? Or are the respective
maintainers willing to maintain the backports, maybe after you
prepared them? Maintaining a backport does include uploading
security fixes, when they come around…
> Given we are looking at 3 stages (cython and libzmq3, python-zmq
> then salt) by 2 distributions is it worth giving the backports
> list advanced warning of the plan?
This never hurts; however, it's also not necessary. It's more
important that the maintainers of the packages involved are aware.
You could write a message to all of them and CC the backports list.
Thanks for your work on this!
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck at d.o> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"my experience is that as soon as people are old enough to know better,
they don't know anything at all."
-- oscar wilde
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1124 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
More information about the pkg-salt-team