[Pkg-samba-maint] Re: tdb* in samba or tdb-tools
noel at debian.org
Mon Dec 26 08:24:10 UTC 2005
Am Sonntag, den 25.12.2005, 16:25 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > I thought it doesn't make much sense if it is developed by upstream
> > samba and then pulled out into tdb-tools. Then it will cause the
> > "problem" like now that the tdb-tools is outdated:
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/2005-December/000159.html
> > Thats why I preferred it this way but its just IMHO and if you think
> > keeping it in tdb-tools is better then I revert this change.
> No, I'm asking whether tdb-tools should be built from the samba sources as a
> separate binary package.
Thats a good idea.
Noèl Köthe <noel debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20051226/b0abdf2e/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-samba-maint