[Pkg-samba-maint] Which idmap_* should we build?

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:14:16AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > This week-end, I think we can think about uploading a new release of
> > the package as the former one will enter testing.

> Apparently it's stuck because it thinks there are RC bugs.  Either it's 
> not understanding BTS version tags or I'm not understanding them.

Yes, britney does not understand BTS version tags yet.  Instead, I added a
force hint to get samba in, as soon as I saw this; as long as you wait until
after next dinstall before uploading 3.0.21b, 3.0.21a-4 should get into
testing just fine tomorrow.

On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:23:23AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Peter Eisentraut (peter_e at gmx.net):
> > Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > This week-end, I think we can think about uploading a new release of
> > > the package as the former one will enter testing.

> > Apparently it's stuck because it thinks there are RC bugs.  Either it's 
> > not understanding BTS version tags or I'm not understanding them.

> Hmmm, nothing in #350050 does tell that this RC bug should be ignored
> in some way

The version tags on the bug should say this; it's a bug in britney that this
isn't taken into consideration when moving packages to testing.  Please bug
the release team when this happens, rather than trying to fiddle with the
bug to make britney happy...

> However: is this bug really RC?

> All these python things are mostly unknown stuff to me but does this
> really "makes the package in question unusable"....or are there only
> *parts* of the package that are broken, which means that the bug is
> indeed "important" and not "grave".

$ python2.3
Python 2.3.5 (#2, Nov 20 2005, 16:40:39)
[GCC 4.0.3 20051111 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-4)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import samba.lsa
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/samba/lsa.so: undefined symbol: cli_nt_session_open
>>> import samba.samr
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/samba/samr.so: undefined symbol: cli_nt_session_open
>>> import samba.spoolss
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/samba/spoolss.so: undefined symbol: cli_nt_session_open
>>> import samba.srvsvc
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/samba/srvsvc.so: undefined symbol: cli_nt_session_open
>>> import samba.tdbpack
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
ValueError: module functions cannot set METH_CLASS or METH_STATIC
>>> import samba.winbind
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/samba/winbind.so: undefined
symbol: cli_nt_session_open
>>> import samba.winreg
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/samba/winreg.so: undefined
symbol: cli_nt_session_open
>>>

... I suppose you get the idea. :)  The only module which *does* import
correctly is samba.tdb.  Yes, this is RC.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon at debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20060204/f3723f68/attachment.pgp