tdb* in samba or tdb-tools [was: Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] r813 -
vorlon at debian.org
Mon Jan 2 05:17:23 UTC 2006
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 08:08:35AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Thats why I preferred it this way but its just IMHO and if you think
> > > keeping it in tdb-tools is better then I revert this change.
> > No, I'm asking whether tdb-tools should be built from the samba sources as a
> > separate binary package.
> I think that it should be separated unless the Samba Team explicitely
> says that these utilities will be kept maintained by them and thus
> guaranteed up-to-date.
But isn't the current problem that the tdb-tools package *not* maintained by
the Samba Team is out of date?
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon at debian.org http://www.debian.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20060101/09edb418/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-samba-maint