[Pkg-samba-maint] Close bugs tagged "sarge" with appropriate version tracking?

[Steve Langasek]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:48:51PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> After the recent story, I wonder whether we should close the bugs that
> are currently tagged "sarge" for samba.

> Of course, I will then close them with the appropriate version
> tracking (ie "Version: 3.0.20b-3").

> This concerns:

> #330999: samba.postinst destroys smbpasswd if LDAP/NIS is down
> #288995: samba: FTBFS on sarge (not tagged "sarge" but should)

No, it shouldn't be.  Your own follow-up acknowledges that it still affects
etch.

> #320010: winbind: Erroneous retrieving/mapping of user secondary groups

For the other two, closing them with version tracking should be fine.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon at debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20060112/826a74a4/attachment.pgp