[Pkg-samba-maint] samba 3 and 4 in parallel in unstable?

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Peter Eisentraut (peter_e at gmx.net):

> Packages that are not targeted for the release simply do not belong into 
> unstable.  I doubt that the exposure argument counts for much.  Users 
> who are looking to test samba 4 but are unable to find it in 
> experimental would not end up being very helpful testers anyway.

Yep, that arguments counts. However, I still keep thinking that we
should be ready to have both packages families coexist.

After all, nothing currently tells us that samba4 cannot be considered
"ready for release" before the targeted etch release date (though I
slightly doubt it).

Anyawy, as we have the release manager in the team, I think that his
advice will be worth being read on that topic.

--