[Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#400617: It seems FAM was not really wanted

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Santiago Garcia Mantinan (manty at debian.org):

> If FAM was really not intended I think we should disable it on our config
> and upload with high urgency to get a version without FAM to testing ASAP.


A discussion we had yesterday on IRC with Steve, lead to the
conclusion that this bug is really worth being fixed for etch.

Disabling in the provided config file is of course not enough and we
should probably, at least for etch, disable the FAM support.

However, upstream did not provide a clean way to do it in its
configure script so I guees that fixing this is up to people in the
team that have a better knowledge than me on configure scripts. 

Steve, Peter, Noèl, Eloy?

manty also, if you come up with a patch..:-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20061128/28dcdd8f/attachment.pgp