[Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#408033: smbfs: smbmount-unix-caps.patch no longer needed

[Christian Perrier]

> > Even if it's still a case that all server-side perms are ignored, dropping
> > this patch is still an improvement for users wanting symlink support,
> > apparently.  So I agree with dropping it, as long as we're sure the kernel
> > changes are in place.
> 
> Cool. What's the samba team's opinion of the userspace patches going into
> etch/sarge? Here's a port of the patch that applies to both etch and
> sarge:


Well, that's more a question for the release managers, first. Would
they allow such change in samba, for etch?

Steve, you might need to switch your cap....:)

Apart from that, I'm afraid that I have personnelly no opinion due to
the lack of needed skills.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20070130/d8b2148d/attachment.pgp