[Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#486370: samba4: outdated package description

[Justin B Rye]

Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> No - your wording makes it sound like SMB2 is the main feature of Samba 4. It's just a
>  minor part of Samba 4 and Samba 3 will probably support it as well soon. 

Does this mean you want to keep the line about supporting "Windows,
NT, OS/2 and DOS clients", or is it just that you've got some better
summary in mind of Samba 4's reason for existing?  That wouldn't be 
surprising; after all, I'm not even a Samba 4 user yet!

> The samba and samba4 packages will be maintained separately in lenny+1.
> So it would be nice to have a bug report as well for samba 3.

It's looking more and more as if I've done this completely backwards
and the way to go is to submit separate niggly bugreports against
each individual problem with the package descriptions in the Samba 3
control file.  Then after those are fixed I can come back and look
at the Samba 4 suite.
-- 
JBR
Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing)