[Pkg-samba-maint] We have a new lintian warning
Christian Perrier
bubulle at debian.org
Mon Jan 5 06:19:13 UTC 2009
W: samba source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends smbfs
N:
N: The source package uses debhelper but it does not use ${misc:Depends} in
N: the given binary package's debian/control entry. This is required so the
N: dependencies are set correctly in case the result of a call to any of
N: the dh_ commands cause the package to depend on another package.
N:
N: Refer to the debhelper(7) manual page for details.
N:
N: Severity: normal; Certainty: certain
N:
W: samba source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends smbclient
W: samba source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libsmbclient
W: samba source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libwbclient0
W: samba source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends samba-dbg
W: samba source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libsmbclient-dev
W: samba source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends samba-doc
W: samba source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libpam-smbpass
W: samba source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends samba-doc-pdf
The fix is trivial but given Steve's pickyness and reluctance to
implement things just because lintian warns about them, I prefer
asking..:-)
(of course, that change would be for post-lenny where we should indeed
try to lower down the bunch of lintian warnings we have)
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20090105/d42cfd9d/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-samba-maint
mailing list