[Pkg-samba-maint] [obnox at samba.org: about the non-linux ports patch from bug #266693]

Michael Adam obnox at samba.org
Wed May 6 10:00:35 UTC 2009


Hmm, I tried to send this to 266693 at bugs.debian.org as the bug
page suggests (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266693)
but this could not be delivered...

Re-sending it to pkg-samba-maint with the original reporter
and patch submitter in Cc.

Michael

----- Forwarded message from Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> -----

Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:57:25 +0200
From: Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org>
To: 266693 at bugs.debian.org
Subject: about the non-linux ports patch from bug #266693
Reply-To: obnox at samba.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

Hi,

I am currently reviewing the non-linux-ports.patch of the debian
packages for upstream inclusion. It seems to have originated in
this bug report.

I have a couple of questions / concerns with the patch to 
configure.in:

The patch has several hunks like this:

-    *linux*)
+    linux*-gnu* | gnu* | k*bsd*-gnu)

This has the potential disadvantage that it may make
less systems match. I'd change this to the following:

-    *linux*)
+    *linux* | gnu* | k*bsd*-gnu)

Or are there good reasons for being more restrictive?

Another hunk that I found strange in the current version is this:

-    *freebsd[[5-9]]*)
+    freebsd5*|*freebsd[[6-9]]*)

This seems to have evolved from the original hunk:

-    *freebsd5*)
+    freebsd5*)

I suspect that this is meant to _not_ match the
k*bsd*-gnu patterns from the above hunks, right?

But this would have been caught by the above
linux*-gnu* | gnu* | k*bsd*-gnu) anyways.

So I would rather not change this and leave it as
*freebsd[[6-9]])
if there are no good reasons against this.

This way I would reduced the side-effects for non-debian builds.

Would the thus adapted patch have a change to replace the
current debian version for upstream?

Any comments?

Michael

BTW: If anyone could put a Debian GNU/kFreeBSD or other GNU/*bsd*
machine into the samba build farm (http://build.samba.org/),
that would really help monitoring the working of such changes!
Note that donation just means using some harddisk space and cpu
cycles.


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Michael Adam <ma at sernet.de>  <obnox at samba.org>
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.SerNet.DE, mailto: Info @ SerNet.DE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 206 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20090506/ef4dbcfd/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Pkg-samba-maint mailing list