[Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#527025: Bug#527025: samba: location of "private dir" is wrong

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer at samba.org):

> > That's upstream recommendation, AFAIK and very probably (but needs
> > to be checked) what other distros are doing.
> /var/lib/samba is really much more appropriate than /etc/samba for the
> private directory, which only contains databases that should generally
> not be touched by sysadmins directly. I think it's wrong if we as
> upstream recommend /etc/samba/private somewhere.

Hmmm, OK. Let's say that I may have misunderstood something if *even*
our upstream reference says that these files better belong to
/var/lib/samba..:-)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20090506/e82763d8/attachment.pgp>