[Pkg-samba-maint] [samba] 01/20: Update instructions to reference upstream VCS tag.
abartlet at samba.org
Mon Dec 9 20:57:45 UTC 2013
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 12:53 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:24:22AM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Hi Steve,
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 06:58:29PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:39:54AM +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
> > > > jelmer pushed a commit to branch samba_4.1
> > > > in repository samba.
> > > Why are these commits all going to the samba_4.1 branch? Could you please
> > > put packaging changes on the master branch? (I noticed this was the case
> > > with your previous changes to the update-alternatives handling... which on
> > > the master branch has been fixed to be done in postinst instead of in
> > > prerm. So there may be conflicts between the two branches to be fixed
> > > now...)
> > I tend do my development on one branch at the same time (rather than
> > switching back and forth) so I fixed the issue here first. I think the
> > update-alternatives fix is the only one that would also apply to master,
> > so I'll just revert that.
> > The other changes are all specific to the 4.1 branch. I don't think starting
> > to import full upstream history now for the 4.0 branch makes sense.
> Ok. Thanks for the fix-up of the maintainer script stuff.
> From your POV, what are the criteria for switching to 4.1 in Debian? Is 4.1
> considered a "development branch" upstream? Do we potentially want it
> uploaded to experimental?
4.1 is a full production release. Development is in master.
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Pkg-samba-maint