[Pkg-samba-maint] [SCM] Debian packaging for Samba branch, samba_4.0_bubulle, updated. upstream/4.0.5+dfsg1-789-gda57358

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubulle at debian.org):

> My preference would go for samba. Though these are techically speaking
> libraries, one could argue they are so very closely related to samba
> FPS daemons that it's better to provide them altogether.


Also : the VFS modules were originally provided in samba in 3.6
packages. So that change is part of our current policy to not move
files around between packages in the 3.6->4.0 transition.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20130519/56715bac/attachment.pgp>