[Pkg-samba-maint] Samba 4.0: Upload to unstable.
vorlon at debian.org
Wed Sep 25 20:19:18 UTC 2013
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:45:03PM +0200, Clement Wong wrote:
> Wait for 4.1?
That doesn't answer "what needs to be done". Unless there are specific
things that we should be working on / testing, there's no reason to wait for
> Or is it easy to upload 4.1 to unstable in the future according to the
Once 4.1 is released we would update to it in unstable. So yes, there's no
reason to block the upload to unstable waiting for 4.1.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
> > On Sep 25, 2013, at 21:39, Steve Langasek <vorlon at debian.org> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:12:46PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 02:37:36AM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> >>> Lintian still gives a lot of errors and warnings. Before we can upload
> >>> to unstable we should fix most of them (or silence them if what we do
> >>> is correct). This is the lintian output I get:
> >> Some comments on a number of those:
> >>> E: libnss-winbind: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_wins.so lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_wins.so.2 libnss_wins.so
> >>> E: libnss-winbind: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_winbind.so lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_winbind.so.2 libnss_winbind.so
> >> I committed a fix for those.
> > This is a wrong fix. These are not shlibs, they're DSOs, and lintian is
> > wrong to report this error for them.
> >>> E: samba-common-bin: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/bin/samba-tool
> >>> E: samba-common-bin: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/sbin/samba_kcc
> >>> E: samba: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate
> >>> E: samba: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/sbin/samba_spnupdate
> >>> E: samba: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/sbin/samba_upgradedns
> >> Don't spend time on these. Some people think experimenting with :all
> >> dependencies should happen in unstable instead of experimental, and don't
> >> mind breaking stuff on the way. This error will likely go away in the
> >> next version of lintian (#711988).
> > Just because lintian wasn't caught up doesn't mean it's experimental.
> >>> W: samba-dsdb-modules: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
> >>> W: samba-dsdb-modules: postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
> >>> W: samba-testsuite: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
> >>> W: samba-testsuite: postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
> >> Lintian suggests that this is actually a bug in debhelper.
> > Yes, that seems to be the case.
> >>> And what's up with the branches btw? We currently have samba_4.0,
> >>> samba_4.0_integrate and samba_4.0_integration. I just merged the
> >>> commit done by Andrew in samba_4.0 to the samba_4.0_integration
> >>> branch. Is there any reason the samba_4.0_integration branch can't be
> >>> pushed to samba_4.0 and we can't just all work on in the samba_4.0
> >>> branch?
> >> I merged everything into samba_4.0. We should just continue development
> >> there.
> > Should we delete the other branches now as obsolete?
> > What else needs to be done yet before we upload?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Pkg-samba-maint