[Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#732342: Stack Trace
Steve Langasek
vorlon at debian.org
Wed Jan 8 00:58:41 UTC 2014
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:54:32PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9...Reading
> > > symbols from
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9.2.0...done.
> > > done.
> > > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9
> > > That happened with the samba server in PDC mode, running "passwd"
> > > via sssd or changing the password via Windows 8.
> > I'm sorry to say that this stack trace shows signs of stack corruption.
> > "0x0000000000000000" and "0x0000000000000008" are not valid addresses to
> > appear in a backtrace.
> > You may have better luck debugging by running under valgrind, which can
> > often detect stack corruption errors at runtime /before/ they clobber the
> > stack.
> I strongly suspect in this and in 734355 that Heimdal and Samba have got
> out of sync. We use libhdb (and other parts) from Heimdal in a quite
> intimate manner.
By "intimate", do you mean "using private interfaces"?
What are the relevant values of "in-sync-ness" for heimdal?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20140107/20094fb1/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-samba-maint
mailing list