[Pkg-samba-maint] samba from experimental FTBFS

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 10:34:11PM +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> hello,
> 
> 2015-06-23 23:37 GMT+02:00 Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at debian.org>:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:29:19PM +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> >> 2015-06-23 2:09 GMT+02:00 Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at debian.org>:
> >> [...]
> >> > FWIW Remaining todo items for the experimental branch before we can do
> >> > an upload:
> >> >
> >> >  * re-enable ctdb support and merge with the ctdb packages
> 
> I have pushed my changes.
> 
> Known todo:
> - re-enable clustering support in samba
> - fix new lintian warnings:
> +E: ctdb-pcp-pmda: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> var/lib/pcp/pmdas/ctdb/pmdactdb /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb: privacy-breach-logo usr/share/doc/ctdb/web/footer.html
> (http://www.google.com/logos/logo_25wht.gif)
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_bench
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_fetch_one
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_fetch_readonly_loop
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_fetch_readonly_once
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_fetch
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_functest
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_lock_tdb
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_persistent
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_porting_tests
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_randrec
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_store
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_stubtest
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_takeover_tests
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_trackingdb_test
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_transaction
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_traverse
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_update_record_persistent
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> 
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/ctdb_update_record
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +E: ctdb-tests: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb-tests/rb_test
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ctdb
> +W: ctdb: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
> +W: ctdb: postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
> 
> Any help on the rpath+ldconfig?
Do we actually need those tests? Can we just not install them?

Cheers,

Jelmer