[Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#532856: Bug#532856: closed by Mathieu Parent <math.parent at gmail.com> (Closing " umask settings overridden by Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) clients")
Mathieu Parent
math.parent at gmail.com
Fri Jun 29 10:04:27 BST 2018
Control: tags -1 + upstream moreinfo
Le jeu. 28 juin 2018 à 03:00, Josip Rodin <joy at debbugs.entuzijast.net> a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:51:03PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Closing as this is not a bug but a configuration tuning.
>
> Sorry, what? I don't see such an explanation in the bug log.
"unix extensions = no" fixes your problem, isn't it?
> Two people said "unix extensions = no" would work around the issue.
> Nobody provided an actual solution to the issue.
This is not a workaround, this is a solution. Otherwise MacOS X uses
"chmod" (an UNIX extension), and nothing prevents it server-side.
> Nobody responded to the part where I said:
>
> > I had specified all documented options that describe native Linux permission
> > masks to be applied on files on Samba shares. The daemon ignored this
> > because of another implicit option being in effect, one which contradicted
> > those other, explicit settings.
Please tell exactly which options your are talking about.
> That just doesn't make sense from a user
> > standpoint, regardless of the rationale. A proper bug fix would be to change
> > the behaviour of that new option to take into account the requirements set
> > by old options (better), or to fully document the impact of the new option
> > and make it explicit (worse, but still satisfactory).
Please tell exactly which options your are talking about.
> Can you?
The "create mask" doesn't impact the chmod UNIX extension. And nothing
prevents this chmod except "unix extensions = no" or insufficient
perms (i.e. local UNIX permissions as if you runt chmod locally).
Regards
--
Mathieu Parent
More information about the Pkg-samba-maint
mailing list