[Pkg-samba-maint] ldb version, again

[L. van Belle]

I like this..  :-) 

I've started on backporting 4.16 for bullseye and later Ubuntu Jammy.
So if the naming is as shown below, i can also go start building. 

P.S. 
> >>     2:2.5.0+smb-1+samba4.0.16
I expect thats offcourse.. 
> >>     2:2.5.0+smb-1+samba4.16.0 

So, im looking at the BPO settings for version-naming

Im thinking this should be right. 
buster 	: ORIGINALVERSION~bpo10+1
Bullseye	: ORIGINALVERSION~bpo11+1
*( out of scope since its ubuntu)
Focal		: ORIGINALVERSION~bpo20.04+1
Impish	: ORIGINALVERSION~bpo21.04+1
Jammy		: ORIGINALVERSION~bpo22.04+1

I'll be using : dch --bpo
Unless you guys have an other suggestion to use a format as above, 
Tips always welkom.

I also had an "upgrade" thingy on ubuntu i want/need to fix, 
and was just thinking on a nice nameing fix, and i want to stay 
as close to official namings as possible to avoid upgrade problems.
I noticed debian and ubuntu use bit different style on naming. 

So on the backporting part, im trying this todo the debian way 
so we can use them within debian official.

And guys.. Wat a fantastic job are your doing.. 
This is a part i would never be able todo.. 

I've still a spinning head from all changes i saw.. :-)) 


Greetz, 

Louis

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Pkg-samba-maint 
> [mailto:pkg-samba-maint-bounces+belle=bazuin.nl at alioth-lists.d
> ebian.net] Namens Michael Tokarev
> Verzonden: woensdag 6 april 2022 11:38
> Aan: Mathieu Parent
> CC: Debian Samba Maintainers
> Onderwerp: Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] ldb version, again
> 
> 06.04.2022 12:23, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 11:15 AM Michael Tokarev 
> <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote:
> ...
> >> versions number.  Or just for this very issue, for
> >> this very version of ldb, we can temporarily add an
> >> extra suffix, so it becomes
> >>
> >>     2:2.5.0+smb-1+samba4.0.16
> >>
> >> (the +smb sorts after +samba so everything's ok wrt
> >> the sort order, but we'll have to remember to remove
> >> this suffix for 2.5.1).
> 
> Actually the more I think about it the more I like this
> solution. It will be best for everyone. And with a simple
> check in d/rules that ldb is still at 2.5.0 and fails if
> not, we'll be notified about the version bump :)
> 
> Yes it wont be pretty but it will be *almost* pretty :)
> 
> What do you think? :)
> 
> /mjt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-samba-maint mailing list
> Pkg-samba-maint at alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-s
> amba-maint
> 
>