[Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#993014: Processed: Re: cifs-utils non-parallel FTBFS

[L. van Belle]

> I think both are wrong but both do the job.
Yes, I think also, but that’s not something I can do. 
This "fix" works fine so far, but yeah, upstream should fix it. 

> Now, the question is: do we need to fix this for bullseye?
> It smells like there's no need to, no?
No, not that I think off, current bullseye version builds as far I know, 
but I hardly do cifs-utils packages. its only that I needed it now on 1 server.  

The shown fix, commit aeaa786aceb0ea781ded2c151fb68f6b34880ad4 
is the patch I added. 
and cifs-utils 7.0 also fails to build without that patch with parallel=1 

And yes, we can leave Bullseye versions alone, but would be nice to add this one  to unstable. 
At least the patch fixed this bug report 😊 

Greetz, 

Louis


> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Pkg-samba-maint <pkg-samba-maint-bounces+belle=bazuin.nl at alioth-
> lists.debian.net> Namens Debian Bug Tracking System
> Verzonden: donderdag 25 augustus 2022 10:15
> Aan: Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru>
> CC: pkg-samba-maint at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Onderwerp: [Pkg-samba-maint] Processed: Re: cifs-utils non-parallel FTBFS
> 
> Processing control commands:
> 
> > tag -1 + pending
> Bug #993014 [src:cifs-utils] cifs-utils non-parallel FTBFS Added tag(s) pending.
> 
> --
> 993014: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993014
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-samba-maint mailing list
> Pkg-samba-maint at alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-samba-maint