[Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#1064337: Bug#1064337:

[Michael Hudson-Doyle]

On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 21:49, Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote:

> 21.02.2024 11:26, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > I have prepared another patch on top of what is in experimental now
> (attached as nmu_samba.debdiff), does it look better?
> >
> > I have also prepared a patch on top of what is currently in unstable,
> attached as nmu_samba_unstable.debdiff.
>
> It's named nmu_samba_STABLE.debdiff, though - made me confused for a bit :)
>

Oops, sorry about that!


> Yes, this is exactly what I had in mind, and already prepared the very
> same changes
> locally in the package git repository.
>
> > I think the ideal way forward would be to upload to experimental asap to
> check it builds and to let Helmut run dumat on it and then upload the
> > unstable patch when the transition starts in earnest (planned for Friday
> this week). The changes are pretty orthogonal to the differences between
> what
> > is unstable and experimental currently afaict.
>
> Yes, that's what I was thinking about, too.
> Still, I prefer to have 4.19 in unstable so far, not 4.20-rc.
>

That makes sense. We definitely do not want to have to coordinate with
other transitions for this, so it sounds like we (or maybe you!) should
just patch the 4.19 in unstable and then you can migrate 4.20 when it suits
you.

So we can either do an NMU of 4.19, based on your
> nmu_samba_UNstable.debdiff,
> or I can do a regular upload once the transition starts.
>

In some sense it would be easiest to just NMU samba like we are planning to
with everything else but I don't have a strong feeling about this.


> Uploading what I have for experimental now, which is essentially
> the same as your nmu_samba.debdiff.
>

Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20240221/eb9eef52/attachment.htm>