libsdl2 copyright file revisited

Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montezelo at
Thu Aug 2 22:57:38 UTC 2012

2012/7/26 Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz at>:
> Hi!
> 2012/7/22 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo at>:
>> For Luca:  You rejected a few weeks ago the package [2], mostly due to
>> this problem of documenting copyright and license.  Can you please
>> tell us if there are still big issues that would prevent the package
>> from being accepted by FTP-masters?
> I don't think there were any major problems, so as long as the
> copyright information is complete, I do not see any blockers for
> libsdl2 to be accepted.

Thanks, Luca.  I meant mainly if you think that the new copyright file
looks acceptable, from a FTP-masters perspective -- did you look at
the new file?

Apart from documenting the change in license upstream, since you
expressed concerns about files for OS-X build files and so on, I went
and documented things quite thoroughly, but I don't know if there's
still something missing.

For the rest, incl. Sam if still interested, could you please review
and, if everybody is happy, sponsor the upload?

Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo at>

More information about the Pkg-sdl-maintainers mailing list