libsdl2 copyright file revisited

[Luca Falavigna]

2012/8/3 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo at gmail.com>:
> 2012/7/26 Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz at debian.org>:
>> Hi!
>>
>> 2012/7/22 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo at gmail.com>:
>>> For Luca:  You rejected a few weeks ago the package [2], mostly due to
>>> this problem of documenting copyright and license.  Can you please
>>> tell us if there are still big issues that would prevent the package
>>> from being accepted by FTP-masters?
>>
>> I don't think there were any major problems, so as long as the
>> copyright information is complete, I do not see any blockers for
>> libsdl2 to be accepted.
>
> Thanks, Luca.  I meant mainly if you think that the new copyright file
> looks acceptable, from a FTP-masters perspective -- did you look at
> the new file?

I did, but I haven't checked it against the orig tarball, but as long
as it's complete, it will be fine.

> Apart from documenting the change in license upstream, since you
> expressed concerns about files for OS-X build files and so on, I went
> and documented things quite thoroughly, but I don't know if there's
> still something missing.

Good, thanks for that.