SDL2 2.0.4 is out!

[Tobias Leich]

Hi Felix, configure.in says:
>> SDL_MAJOR_VERSION=2
>> SDL_MINOR_VERSION=0
>> SDL_MICRO_VERSION=4
>> SDL_INTERFACE_AGE=0
>> SDL_BINARY_AGE=4
>
> # set SDL_BINARY_AGE and SDL_INTERFACE_AGE to 0.
> set(SDL_MAJOR_VERSION 2)
> set(SDL_MINOR_VERSION 0)
> -set(SDL_MICRO_VERSION 2)
> +set(SDL_MICRO_VERSION 4)
> set(SDL_INTERFACE_AGE 0)
> -set(SDL_BINARY_AGE 2)
> +set(SDL_BINARY_AGE 4)
> set(SDL_VERSION "${SDL_MAJOR_VERSION}.${SDL_MINOR_VERSION}.${SDL_MICRO_VERSION}")
>
>
> this is the patch when the new upstream has been imported.
>
> they bumped the ABI and API AFAICS
>
>
>> If this is true we need to bump SHLIBS in d/rules to 2.0.4 and nothing >else.
>
> what about the link?
> dh_link -plibsdl2-dev usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/libSDL2-2.0.so.0.4.0 usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/libSDL2-2.0.so
>
>
> I see they changed prototypes, e.g.
> -extern DECLSPEC int SDLCALL SDL_SetError(const char *fmt, ...);
> +extern DECLSPEC int SDLCALL SDL_SetError(SDL_PRINTF_FORMAT_STRING const char *fmt, ...) SDL_PRINTF_VARARG_FUNC(1);
>
> and something added to structs.
>
> Are them API compatible changes? I think/guess not, right?
That looks API compatible to me. And if they just add to structs but do 
not reorder or remove, that's fine too.
>
> cheers,
>
> G.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-sdl-maintainers mailing list
> Pkg-sdl-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sdl-maintainers
>