Bug#873821: wcc Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed
Adrian Bunk
bunk at debian.org
Thu Aug 31 18:56:19 UTC 2017
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:43:35PM +0200, Philippe Thierry wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Le 31/08/2017 à 16:01, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > Package: wcc
> > Version: 0.0.2+dfsg-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > wcc : Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-8 is to be installed
> Thanks for the report.
>
> I've check where the error comes from. This is the result of the version
> of binutils dependency (<2.29) generated by dpkg-buildpackage. The
> source package only has a build dependency on binutils-dev (without
> explicit version).
> When building again the package, the Depends list is updated:
>
> Depends: libbinutils (>= 2.29), libbinutils (<< 2.30), libc6 (>= 2.14), libcapstone3 (>= 3.0.0), libelf1 (>= 0.142), liblua5.3-0, libopenlibm2 (>= 0.4), lua5.2
>
> This means that a simple rebuild of wcc with uptodate sid should correct
> the error,
Sorry my bad, then a binNMU should be sufficient.
But since you anyway plan an upload for #873783 this will en passant
also fix this problem.
> but if I update the package version (to 0.0.2+dfsg-2), the
> upgrade test of piupart will also fails, while the -1 version of the
> package is not rebuilt in the Debian ftp-master.
There won't be any problems with piuparts when you upload 0.0.2+dfsg-2
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
More information about the Pkg-security-team
mailing list