[Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#280212: marked as forwarded (lastlog: fails when high UID's present)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner@bugs.debian.org
Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:03:21 -0800

Your message dated Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:10:30 +0100
with message-id <20050106061030.GV15763@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
has caused the Debian Bug report #280212,
regarding lastlog: fails when high UID's present
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Tomasz =?utf-8?Q?K=C5=82oczko?= <kloczek@zie.pg.gda.pl>.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at 280212-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2005 06:55:24 +0000
>From bubulle@kheops.frmug.org Wed Jan 05 22:55:24 2005
Return-path: <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>
Received: from onera.onera.fr [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CmRYK-0006az-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:55:24 -0800
Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera (localhost [])
        by onera.onera.fr  with ESMTP id j066tMcW028298;
        Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:55:22 +0100 (MET)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
	id ADF7B232A5; Thu,  6 Jan 2005 07:10:30 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:10:30 +0100
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: Tomasz =?utf-8?Q?K=C5=82oczko?= <kloczek@zie.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: 280212-forwarded@bugs.debian.org, vorlon@debian.org,
Subject: (forw) Bug#280212: lastlog: fails when high UIDs are present
Message-ID: <20050106061030.GV15763@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
Reply-To: 280212@bugs.debian.org, kloczek@zie.pg.gda.pl,
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-message-flag: Outlook is a good virus spreading tool. It can send mail, too.
X-pot_a_miel: honeypot@kheops.frmug.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 280212-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

(please respect Reply-To, possibly)

Thanks for report this, Steve. I forward this to Tomasz as upstream
for having his advice on the issue.

Steve, as release manager, you're aware of the situation of shadow
currently and the fact that I'm trying to build a maintenance team for
post-sarge maintenance of the package. In the meantime, I'm doing my
best (or less worse) for properly maintaining it in good shape.

As you didn't tag this bug report release critical, I guess you don't
consider it worth being fixed in sarge. Am I right?

If so, we'll probably deal with it post-sarge.

BTW, even if I know you're already wearing too much hats, you're
obviously welcome for joining the team..:-)

----- Forwarded message from Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> -----

Subject: Bug#280212: lastlog: fails when high UIDs are present
Reply-To: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, 280212@bugs.debian.org
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:19:44 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
To: 280212@bugs.debian.org

Attention was drawn to this bug on IRC today.  Since using a 32-bit index
for a file that has more than one byte of data per entry makes it very
possible to have files that exceed a 32-bit file size limit, I agree that
this is a bug and should be fixed.

Two caveats, however:

- it is not safe to use the 64-bit flags in a program if it also exchanges
  file-related structs with a library that does not have 64-bit support
  enabled (I don't think this is a problem here)
- the 64-bit flags don't necessarily have the expected effect on platforms
  that are natively 64-bit -- c.f. bug #280213 (hmm, what a coincidental bug
  #) on exim.  The safe way to do this seems to be to use the output of
  "getconf LFS_CFLAGS".

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

----- End forwarded message -----