[Pkg-shadow-devel] Re: Bug#280212: (forw) Bug#280212: lastlog: fails when high UIDs are present

Tomasz Kłoczko kloczek@zie.pg.gda.pl
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:06:40 +0100 (CET)

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:

> Quoting Tomasz K=B3oczko (kloczek@zie.pg.gda.pl):
>> From current shadow CVS tree NEWS file:
>> shadow-4.0.6 -> shadow-4.0.7
>> [..]
>> - fixed large file support in lastlog and faillog:
>> -- added AC_SYS_LARGEFILE macro to autoconf,
>> -- use fseeko() instead fseek() and remove casting file ofsets to unsign=
>>    long.
>> So upcomming shadow 4.0.7 will be LFS compliant :^)
> But upcoming 4.0.7 will not be in Debian...:-)

OK but I',m only inform about fact LFS specyfic auditing was performed in=
case shadow :)

> However, I guess that adding the patch for this to the 4.0.3 we use is
> not that big deal. Do you by chance of the patch for the above fix
> available?
> (looks like it's more and more time for me to switch the Debian
> specific patches to dpatch in the current version)

Personaly I see only one thing which will must be prepared before this=20
kind move (for recive in all possible points step forward effect): Debian
patches contain fr man pages which will be good update to CVS version of
en man pages. I don't know/remember who was pepare this translation but
will be good inform this man about some things on this area are not=20

*Ludzie nie maj=B1 problem=F3w, tylko sobie sami je stwarzaj=B1*
Tomasz K=B3oczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.p=