[Pkg-shadow-devel] Re: [Pkg-shadow-commits] sid/debian/patches 001_Makefile.in.in.dpatch,1.2,1.3

[Martin Quinson]

--2feizKym29CxAecD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:47:15AM +0200, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
> On Sat, 7 May 2005, Martin Quinson wrote:
>=20
> > What about patching the produced Makefile instead? I do belive that run=
ing
> > autoconf in the package compilation process is a mistake....
> >=20
> > But you're the boss ;)
>=20
> po/Makefile.in.in this file generated by gettextize and changeing this
> file in projest it is incorrect move.
> If anything is wrong in this file this must be disscused with gettext=20
> maintainer and after fixing this package po/Makefile.in.in must be=20
> regenerated by run "gettextize --copy --force" before run configure=20
> script (also autoconf/automake suit must be regenerated in this case).

Agreed, but delayed. ;)

My personal TODO regarding shadow is to:
  - switch debian packaging to svn
  - fix as much trivial bugs as we can, so that we can have a better idea of
    what's still to do
  - resync debian package with your lastest version
    (ie, use your package as a base, and give you all upstream bug fixes we
     have)
  - only then, cleanup the debian package such as stop patching am files and
    calling autoconf/automake in the package build process.
   =20
   =20
Thanks for your time,
Mt.

--2feizKym29CxAecD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCf1iTIiC/MeFF8zQRArRkAKDSicRQjY63Nl8h0QJcHk38zBo1DgCgtJuU
uDBK3yDQSWzO/Xud6caREcI=
=W34s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2feizKym29CxAecD--