[Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#277354: marked as done ([TO CLOSE] Needs more recent config.{sub,guess} for k*BSD)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner@bugs.debian.org
Mon, 09 May 2005 05:33:15 -0700
Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2005 14:26:44 +0200
with message-id <20050509122644.GJ4063@papagos>
and subject line [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#277354: shadow: Needs more recent config.{sub,guess} for k*BSD
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2004 16:48:49 +0000
>From sanvila@unex.es Tue Oct 19 09:48:49 2004
Return-path: <sanvila@unex.es>
Received: from pizarro.unex.es [158.49.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CJxAH-00039w-00; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:48:49 -0700
Received: from localhost (almendralejo.unex.es [158.49.8.199])
by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP id 17F89A1C9B
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:48:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pizarro.unex.es ([158.49.8.2])
by localhost (emilio [158.49.17.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 25153-05 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:48:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cantor.unex.es (cantor.unex.es [158.49.18.105])
by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP id 91DB8A1C85
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:48:46 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:48:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: shadow: Needs more recent config.{sub,guess} for k*BSD
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410191844370.8693@cantor.unex.es>
X-Debbugs-Cc: sanvila@unex.es
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at unex.es
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: shadow
Version: 4.0.3-30.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
This package used to compile ok under GNU/kFreeBSD, but it does not anymore,
so we have to create a "forked" version:
http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian/pool/main/s/shadow
It would be nice if you could update config.guess and config.sub to
the most recent version and/or tell the author to do the same.
Thanks.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 277354-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 12:26:52 +0000
>From martin.quinson@loria.fr Mon May 09 05:26:52 2005
Return-path: <martin.quinson@loria.fr>
Received: from imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DV7LY-0004f2-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 05:26:52 -0700
Received: from pamunkey.imag.fr (pamunkey.imag.fr [129.88.69.8])
by imag.imag.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j49CQmER021901;
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:26:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from navajo.imag.fr (navajo.imag.fr [129.88.69.1])
by pamunkey.imag.fr (8.11.6/8.11.3/ImagV2) with ESMTP id j49CKoe09008;
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:20:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.imag.fr ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost)
by navajo.imag.fr with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DV7Rs-000133-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 14:33:24 +0200
Received: from mquinson by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DV7LQ-0006HA-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 14:26:44 +0200
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:26:44 +0200
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, 277354-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#277354: shadow: Needs more recent config.{sub,guess} for k*BSD
Message-ID: <20050509122644.GJ4063@papagos>
References: <20050508210642.GL10370@papagos> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505091308010.11853@cantor.unex.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GlnCQLZWzqLRJED8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505091308010.11853@cantor.unex.es>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Martin Quinson <martin.quinson@loria.fr>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Mon, 09 May 2005 14:26:49 +0200 (CEST)
X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Delivered-To: 277354-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--GlnCQLZWzqLRJED8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:12:13PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, 8 May 2005, Martin Quinson wrote:
>=20
> >=20
> > shadow (1:4.0.3-32) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
> > [...]
> > * Modified debian/rules for "Calling GNU configure properly", see
> > /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
> > [...]
> > * GNU config automated update: config.sub (20010907 to 20050422),
> > config.guess (20010904 to 20050422)
> >=20
> > -- Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> Tue, 3 May 2005 11:53:12 +=
0200
> > =20
> > =20
> > Is it enough to close the bug?
>=20
> Yes, but not because of the changelog entry, but because it says the trut=
h :-)
> (There have been cases where the maintainer by mistake says it does
> something without actually doing so). In this case, see:
>=20
> http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian/pool/main/s/shadow
>=20
> Version 4.0.3-32, uploaded last night, compiled out of the box.
I'm not sure. I seem to understand that you agree to close the bug, what I
do with this mail. If I'm wrong, please reopen and explain me my mistake.
Thanks for your time, Mt.
--GlnCQLZWzqLRJED8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCf1cEIiC/MeFF8zQRAiGNAKCeYVGErjWi2oejGeIDCObk8LH7IQCfZlje
saI+aL8cawJ+L/e0aaRcXAI=
=c45U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--GlnCQLZWzqLRJED8--