[Pkg-shadow-devel] build system and debian/rules discussion

[Christine Spang]

On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 08:07 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> About cdbs, I see it as a way to get Debian packages built in a
> consistent way with only things *really* specific to the package going
> to the debian/rules file...making it simpler to read.

Okay - I suppose this must be something of a longstanding battle between
parties that doesn't have a real good answer. I still tend to take the
thoughts of longtime veterans to heart, as I still consider myself
relatively new here (and they usually have good pictures and ideas about
things).

You are also a longtime veteran, though, and so now I see that not all
of them have the same opinion as joeyh & co. on this subject.

I suppose I'll just keep the transition on the drawing board then for
when I have time.

-- 
Brought to you by UNIX: Watch out baby, We're Coming
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-shadow-devel/attachments/20051015/9b6cdcc0/attachment.pgp