[Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#505071: Bug#505071: closed ... fixed in shadow 1:4.1.3-1
Paul Szabo
psz at maths.usyd.edu.au
Tue Apr 21 08:24:06 UTC 2009
I now got my /proc/self/mem-reading test program to work, and it
seems that neither getspnam() nor getspent() leave "garbage" in
memory: no security risk. - Am wondering if the call to endspent()
is needed, when apparently there is no setspent() anywhere; still,
it can do no harm (other than to confuse fools like me).
Cheers, Paul
Paul Szabo psz at maths.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia
More information about the Pkg-shadow-devel
mailing list