[Pkg-shadow-devel] document pam-based su(1) behavior of SIGTERM/SIGKILL
nicolas.francois at centraliens.net
Tue Sep 8 20:35:49 UTC 2009
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 06:48:04AM -0400, vapier at gentoo.org wrote:
> user report:
> the current pam run_shell() code doesnt seem to check if the child is still
> alive after the SIGTERM and before the SIGKILL, but maybe i missed something
> weird with the signal handler.
I will commit this patch to
* document the su exit values
I'm not sure I would recommend to rely on the su exit values, so maybe
documenting them was not a really good idea.
* wait for the child to terminate, and kill it only if it did not
terminate by itself.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4431 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Pkg-shadow-devel