Shibboleth SP 2.1 and friends imported

[Russ Allbery]

Peter Schober <peter.schober at univie.ac.at> writes:
> * Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> [2008-08-24 13:05]:

>> Maybe it isn't worth releasing a semi-official 2.0 backport, which we
>> would be semi-expected to maintain, when the Lenny release (and thus
>> the 2.1 backport) is so close (at least I hope it is)...  What do you
>> think?

I'm good with that.

> +1
>
> No need for 2.0 backports. I'll be running 2.1 in any case, having it
> in backports would be appreciated. I could then retire my local APT
> repo.

2.1 backports will not be eligible for etch backports.org.  They will for
lenny once backports.org is set up for lenny.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>