dev package dependencies

[Russ Allbery]

Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> writes:
> Russ Allbery <rra at debian.org> writes:
>> Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> writes:

>>> I didn't mean to do anything yet, but it'll have to start from the
>>> bottom up.  I'm not sure it's a good idea to throw in a new version of
>>> xml-security-c before the current one gets into testing.  Can you see
>>> any problem with that?

>> Well, we need to do a new upload anyway to include NOTICE.txt.  I don't
>> think it matters too much one way or the other, given that OpenSAML 2 is
>> going to sit in NEW for a while anyway.

> Okay, I pushed some patches to this end.  I'm a bit worried about
> xml-security-c14 not entering testing, but surely you know better.

Oh, for some reason I kept reading xmltooling when you said
xml-security-c.  Indeed, we shouldn't upload xml-security-c right now,
although I will as soon as it hits testing.  It needs to migrate to finish
the Xerces transition (and the XML-Security transition).

> That would be great.  Yes, it's ready as far as I'm concerned, but I
> didn't dare to trim its Build-depends since the necessary dev
> dependencies aren't in the archive yet, so that would break the build.

Okay, I'll take a look.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>