wferi at niif.hu
Fri May 9 13:53:25 UTC 2008
"Scott Cantor" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> writes:
> While you can certainly install both library sets, you CANNOT install both
> SPs anyway, so there's no basis for supporting both libraries at this point.
> OpenSAML never attracted any serious non-Shib use, intentionally, so there's
> no compelling reason to maintain 1.x as a library if you ship the 2.0 SP.
Before reading this, I modified pkgxmldir in OpenSAML's
schemas/Makefile.am to install the schema files under
/usr/share/xml/opensaml2. This way version 1 and 2 packages don't
have to conflict, but I'm not yet sure whether the SP2 could be
configured to look for the schema files there.
Do you think Shib2 can work this way, or had I better undo this ASAP?
Thanks for all the valuable comments,
More information about the Pkg-shibboleth-devel