rra at debian.org
Tue Sep 16 16:59:34 UTC 2008
"Scott Cantor" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> writes:
>> On the other hand, Scott also mentioned that he would try to get
>> better licenses for the schema files, so that we have to jump through
>> less hoops. Isn't there any news on this front?
> I said I'd look into the OASIS question. They didn't take much of an
> interest other than saying "this shouldn't be interpreted to prevent
> anything important", and since you guys seemed fine with them, I dropped
Well, it would be nice to have an accurate license since right now we're
saying that it's under the Apache 2.0 license (by default, because that's
what the whole package is covered by). But that's reassuring.
> I have nothing to do with the WS-Trust schema. The new WS-Trust schema
> is from OASIS, but ADFS doesn't use the final WS-Trust, so as long as I
> have to be compatible with it, I need the old schema.
Yeah, the WS-Trust thing is separate and is likely to be harder to change
the license on, I expect.
Russ Allbery (rra at debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the Pkg-shibboleth-devel