Upcoming Shibboleth-related package transition

[Scott Cantor]

Russ Allbery wrote on 2009-07-21:
> You're doing the right thing by not matching.  Matching is incorrect.  The
> SONAME should only increase when there are non-backward-compatible changes
> in the API.

Right, though I was speaking of the revision bit rather than the interface
version. I didn't see any reason why I should bump the library to
libname.so.1.0.3 but I wanted to make sure.

-- Scott