Bug#549936: Bug#548126: pu: package opensaml2/2.0-2+lenny1

[Faidon Liambotis]

Florian Weimer wrote:
> Right.  Please upload opensaml2 first (after sending in a source
> debdiff for review), and then wait with uploading shibboleth-sp2 until
> we tell you it's okay to do so.
OK, will do. How should we handle the fact that the newer xmltooling is
breaking the "old" (as in, lenny) opensaml2/shibboleth-sp2?

I don't think it can be solved with regular dpkg constructs (xmltooling
is already present in security), would just mentioning it in the DSA be
alright?

> AFAICT, opensaml2 hasn't been uploaded to stable-proposed-updates yet,
> so no action appears to be required from the release team.
Yes, that's my impression as well, hence I'm closing #548126 (pu) with
this mail.

Thanks,
Faidon