Bug#791323: xml-security-c: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

[Simon McVittie]

Control: tags 791323 + unreproducible

On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:15:01 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
>  - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the
>    library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the
>    library.

I suspect they are not API: they seem to be weak symbols for template
instantiations:

0000000000000000      DF *UND*	0000000000000000  GLIBCXX_3.4.21 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_create(unsigned long&, unsigned long)
00000000000bf240  w   DF .text	0000000000000138  Base        std::_Rb_tree<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >, std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> > >::_M_get_insert_unique_pos(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)
00000000000bf5e0  w   DF .text	000000000000028a  Base        std::map<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, int, std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> > >::operator[](std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)
00000000000bf1f0  w   DF .text	0000000000000048  Base        std::_Rb_tree<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >, std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> > >::_M_erase(std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >*)
00000000000bf380  w   DF .text	0000000000000254  Base        std::_Rb_tree<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >, std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> > >::_M_get_insert_hint_unique_pos(std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)

Using "unreproducible" to mean "probably not a bug, but someone else
should have a look before this is closed". I hope that's OK.

    S