Bug#797623: opensaml2: transition needed for g++-5 ABIs
Ferenc Wagner
wferi at niif.hu
Sat Jan 16 22:07:22 UTC 2016
Russ Allbery <rra at debian.org> writes:
> Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> writes:
>
>> Thanks. Regarding xmltooling, We could as well do a regular upload
>> replacing the liblog4cpp5-dev dependency of libxmltooling-dev with
>> liblog4shib-dev. I only noticed this yesterday when building opensaml
>> pulled in log4cpp, sorry.
>
> I think I was just confused and everything is fine, since the transition
> already happened after the previous NMU. There's still a transition for
> opensaml2 and shibboleth-sp2, I think, but that's tiny and not a big deal.
Do you mean the library name transition (+v5), of which this bug is
about?
> It's probably fine to upload opensaml2 right away, but I'll wait until
> log4shib propagates everywhere just in case.
Looks like it won't, the builds fail everywhere. At first sight the
problem seems to be that on amd64:
checking if gcc static flag -static works... no
which leads to liblog4shib.la being created, while on other arches:
checking if gcc static flag -static works... yes
and liblog4shib.la is not created, leading to an error when debian/rules
tries to remove it. While this would be easy to work around, I really
wonder what's going on. Looking at my older build logs, the -static
flag occasionally worked on amd64, but most of the it does not work
(according to configure). Why does this happen?
--
Thanks,
Feri.
More information about the Pkg-shibboleth-devel
mailing list