xmltooling: allowed dependencies in backports?

[Etienne Dysli-Metref]

On 19/09/16 18:07, Russ Allbery wrote:
> They can depend on other backported packages.  (If they couldn't, there
> are a lot of things, including Shibboleth, that would be impossible to
> backport.)

A follow-up question: should the [build] dependencies of backported
packages be "adjusted" in order to require the backported dependencies?

Example with xmltooling, it has:
Build-Depends:
 ...
 liblog4shib-dev,
 ...
 libxml-security-c-dev (>= 1.7.3-3~),
 ...

Should this be changed to "liblog4shib-dev (>= 1.0.9-3~)" to pull in the
version I backported?

  Etienne

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-shibboleth-devel/attachments/20160922/08e93dd1/attachment.sig>