Shibboleth-SP 3.0.4 update

[Etienne Dysli Metref]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 13/03/2019 19.20, Sam Hartman wrote:
> If you are not a Ubuntu MOTU developer, you'll need to get a
> change request either to old releases  or backports sponsored, but
> they are faster about reviewing those requests than Debian
> generally is.
> 
> Because of their involvement on the Debian side, Etienne would be a
> fine choice to submit the Ubuntu requests.

Hi Sam,

I've filed a SRU request for bionic [1] and was asked to analyse the
impact of an upgrade. Going through reverse dependencies of the five
source packages, I've found libshibresolver1 and moonshot-gss-eap. Do
you think these will be negatively affected by a major upgrade of Shib
libraries? or will they just keep using the old ones? I'd be grateful
if you could comment on the LP bug [1] also.

Cheers,
  Etienne

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shibboleth-sp/+bug/1822069
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=m7R8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----