[Pkg-sugar-devel] Bug#813258: sugar-record-activity: Should sugar-record-activity be removed?
James Cameron
quozl at laptop.org
Mon Feb 1 05:33:49 UTC 2016
Off-topic for a Debian mailing list, sorry.
Happy to answer on devel at lists.laptop.org or
sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
Your question is how to abstract the filesystem changes made by
install of non-free codecs from the rpmfusion repository on a
Fedora 18 system.
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:42:57AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Aside from my rants, this is the crux. If I could have a script which installs
> these files in gstreamer 1.0, I would be happy to upgrade.
> While I haven't made a try in a couple of years, I was unable to find where
> gstreamer 1.0 expects these libraries to be. The files are
> different for xo-1 and xo-1.5, xo-1.75, and xo-4. Meanwhile, jukebox-26 with
> gstreamer 0.1 works fine with 0.106.
>
> Tony
>
> On 02/01/2016 10:07 AM, James Cameron wrote:
>
> sudo cp libgstmad.so /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/
> > sudo chmod 755 /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstmad.so
> > sudo cp libmad.so.0 /usr/lib
> > sudo chmod 755 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0
> > sudo cp libgstfaad.so /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10
> > sudo chmod 755 /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstfaad.so
> > sudo cp libfaad.so.2.0.0 /usr/lib
> > sudo chmod 755 /usr/lib/libfaad.so.2.0.0
> > sudo yum install gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.13-8.fc18.i686.rpm
> > sudo ldconfig
> > sudo rm -rf /home/olpc/.gstreamer-0.10/registry.i386.bin
> >
> > This script installs the necessary codes directly. I am sure the
> > ffmpeg install adds unnecessary code but I don't know how to break
> > this out. However, this script does not work with gstreamer 1.0 and
> > I have spent hours researching the documentation to find out what
> > happened to the libgst* libraries and the registry.i386.bin. The
> > only documentation I found requires installing the complete bad and
> > ugly libraries (granted, this was a couple of years ago so that
> > documentation may now exist - but gstreamer 0.1 works with no
> > problems so no need to spend more time on it).
>
> No idea what you are talking about above; it has no bearing on Debian.
>
> --
> pkg-sugar-devel mailing list
> pkg-sugar-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sugar-devel
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
More information about the pkg-sugar-devel
mailing list