[Pkg-sugar-devel] Bug#813258: Bug#813258: sugar-record-activity: Should sugar-record-activity be removed?

[Moritz Mühlenhoff]

reassign 813258 ftp.debian.org
retitle 813258 RM: Depends on gstreamer 0.10
severity 813258 normal
thanks

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:23:57PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 08:16:47AM +0530, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Moritz Muehlenhoff (2016-01-31 04:00:28)
> > > Should sugar-record-activity be removed? It depends on gstreamer, 
> > > which is scheduled for removal and there doesn't seem to be any 
> > > upstream activity to port it to modern gstreamer.
> > >
> > > Please address the outstanding bugs or reassign this to ftp.debian.org 
> > > for removal.
> > 
> > Thanks for the concern.  Upstream is quite slow but not dead, so I will 
> > keep waiting.
> 
> Ok. Since there's now only a handful of packages left using gstreamer 0.10
> I will file removal bugs for it and the remaining reverse deps in 3-4 weeks.
> 
> If sugar-record-activity can't be updated in time, it can easily re-enter
> the archive after it has been ported to gstreamer 1.0.

We're down to three remaining reverse deps of gstreamer 0.10. Doing so now.

Cheers,
        Moritz