[Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#846026: Bug#846026: strongswan: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

[Yves-Alexis Perez]

On Sun, 2016-12-18 at 16:01 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 03:21:14PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > But at some point it's just not practical.
> 
> This is becoming interesting. So, would you be in favour of
> establishing some kind of "probability of failure" threshold under
> which every FTBFS bug stop being severity:serious?
> 
> [ In some sense, you have already done that in this report ].
> 
> I asked the release managers what to do with packages which FTBFS
> randomly, but they didn't give me any useful guideline yet.
> 
> Based on your "at some point" above, do you personally think that
> probability-based RC-ness is the way to go, and if yes, where would
> you put the threshold?

I just meant I want to stop losing my time on this particular issue.

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-swan-devel/attachments/20161218/e7575254/attachment-0001.sig>