Bug#753589: systemd: missing pre-dependencies for runlevel(8) etc.

Andreas Metzler ametzler at bebt.de
Mon Aug 4 18:35:58 BST 2014


On 2014-08-04 Simon McVittie <smcv-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > Depends: libacl1 (>= 2.2.51-8), libaudit1 (>= 1:2.2.1), libblkid1 (>= 2.17.2), [-libc6 (>= 2.17),-] libcap2 (>= 2.10), libcryptsetup4 (>= 2:1.4.3), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.1.1), [-libgcrypt11 (>= 1.5.1),-] libkmod2 (>= 5~), [-liblzma5 (>= 5.1.1alpha+20120614),-] libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1), libselinux1 (>= 2.1.9), [-libsystemd-daemon0 (= 208-5),-] libsystemd-journal0 (= 208-5), libudev1 (>= 189), libwrap0 (>= 7.6-4~), libsystemd-login0 (= 208-5), util-linux (>= 2.19.1-2), initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-17), sysv-rc, udev, acl, adduser, libcap2-bin
> > {+Pre-Depends: libc6 (>= 2.17), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.0.2), libgcrypt11 (>= 1.5.1), liblzma5 (>= 5.1.1alpha+20120614), libselinux1 (>= 2.0.65), libsystemd-daemon0 (= 208-5)+}

> Expanded dependency tree:

> libc6 is already quasi-Essential, via e.g. coreutils
> libdbus-1-3 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.17)
> libgcrypt11 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.15)
> libgcrypt11 Depends: libgpg-error0 (>= 1.10), already satisfied in stable
[...]

Hello,

Could you use this opportunity to move to libgcrypt20? It would be
nice to avoid adding th pre-dependency on libgcrypt11 now and later
have another discussion when replacing with one on libgcrypt20.

thanks for considering, cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'




More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list