Bug#772700: vt2-6 still not available with base system

[Simon McVittie]

On 12/12/14 16:55, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 12.12.2014 um 17:18 schrieb Simon McVittie:
>> Any reason not to prefer "Wants=getty at tty2.service ...
>> getty at tty6.service" and "ExecStart=/bin/true"?
> 
> The issue apparently is, that Conditions are evaluated way too late and
> have no influence on the dependency graph.

Fair enough.

> With the suggested static-getty.service, you'd always get the
> traditional behaviour of having 6 gettys (with the only difference that
> with dbus installed, they are started on demand).
> It's unclear to me why you don't want to make use of that feature, if
> available. Can you elaborate?

IMO it simplifies testing if we're using the same code path regardless
of whether dbus is installed. Not a strong objection if you strongly
prefer the on-demand setup.

I'm still a bit wary about having dbus turn up in minimal chroots, but
perhaps bumping it up to Priority: important wouldn't be so bad - that
would put it in a normal or fakechroot debootstrap, but not minbase or
buildd.

    S