[Pkg-systemd-maintainers] Can we depend/recommend on reportbug ≥ 6.5.0?
Michael Biebl
biebl at debian.org
Mon Jan 27 22:39:47 GMT 2014
Am 27.01.2014 23:25, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 27.01.2014 23:18, schrieb Michael Stapelberg:
>> Or do you feel like it’s not a big deal and we should just live with the
>> risk of getting a handful of bugreports where people have a newer
>> systemd package but an older reportbug (i.e. a partially upgraded
>> system) and hence the “systemctl dump” output will be missing and
>> control instructions for reportbug will be visible instead?
>
> If the "new" bug script still works with older versions of reportbug I
> wouldn't bother, tbh.
If only the systemctl dump is missing, then that is fine. It's not
super-critical to have that information and we can always ask for it if
needed.
If using the new features in the bug script leads to problems when
trying to file bugs with older reportbug version, then I'd add the
versioned Breaks.
Hope that makes sense.
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 884 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20140127/afbe0d43/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers
mailing list